• Barclays: No More Oil, Invest in a Greener Future
    Universities are establishments that value critical research and learning but also the long-term prosperity of all students and staff, and of society as a whole. Collectively, we want our institutions to protect the futures we work to realise and to protect our planet and its fragile ecosystems, not to partner with banks financing destructive projects targeting Indigenous land. Our institutions’ commitments to society and the planet must mean putting our money where our mouth is. As members of academic institutions, we have a duty to act on these pressing issues, leading by example. We support the aims of the students' Divest Barclays campaign and value their contribution to this debate.
    911 of 1,000 Signatures
    Created by Angus Satow
  • End Fossil Fuel Recruitment Events - University of Oxford
    When the University of Oxford hosts and promotes job opportunities and events with fossil fuel companies, it lends legitimacy to the notion that these climate-destroying corporations have any place in a sustainable and just future. Science tells us unequivocally that this is false. By hosting and promoting fossil fuel recruitment events, the University of Oxford ignores its responsibility - as an institution of knowledge and learning to act on scientific evidence and consensus, - to its students: fossil fuel careers will not prepare them for the future we need for a liveable planet, - to the Global South: the effects of climate change, which are accelerated by the actions of fossil fuel companies, are hitting and will continue to hit this region of the world first. These consequences are disproportionate to the Global South's responsibility in climate change.
    309 of 400 Signatures
    Created by Oxford Climate Justice Campaign Picture
  • Boycott Barclays across Portsmouth
    We cannot afford to construct any new infrastructure which relies on fossil fuel extraction. We cannot dig any new coal mines, drill any new oil fields, build any more pipelines. Yet right now, projected investment in new fields, mines, and transportation infrastructure over the next twenty years is worth $14 trillion. Barclays is a major investor in fossil fuel infrastructure across the globe it's time for them to halt their support for the fossil fuel industry before they crash the climate.
    1,097 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Victoria Yates
  • Legal Recognition for Climate Refugees
    Already millions are displaced by climate related issues. Between 2008 and 2015 the UNHCR estimates 22.5 million people were displaced by climate or weather related events. This number will by all estimations continue to increase, as extreme weather becomes more and more frequent and intense due to climate change. It has been discovered that rising temperatures in developing countries have correlated to an influx of asylum applications to the EU, and fair policy must be implemented in preparation for this change. It is a widely acknowledged fact that people in developing countries are disproportionately affected by the devastating effects of climate change, despite not being responsible for the majority of emissions that cause these changes. This is why we believe that the UK government has a responsibility to update their migration policy to acknowledge that people leaving their homes because of climate change is a form of forced migration, and those people should be able to seek asylum here in Britain. Climate change is happening, and this is an opportunity for the UK to be a global pioneer for action to respond to its challenges to humanity.
    395 of 400 Signatures
    Created by Paula Lacey
  • University of Kent: Go sweatshop free!
    The International Labour Organisation estimates that around 21 million men, women and children work in conditions of forced labour and slavery today, and we believe it is the University's responsibility to ensure they are not contributing to this horrific statistic. As of this moment, we have no guarantee that sweatshops do not play a part in our university's supply chains and affiliating with Electronics Watch is the best way to rectify this. It's also very easily done, so there's really no excuse!
    148 of 200 Signatures
    Created by People and Planet UKC Picture
  • Cambridge University, cut your ties with fossil fuel money and commit to divestment now.
    The Guardian investigation revealed that a member of the working group was simultaneously the lead contact for a combined donation of £22 million from BHP Billiton and BP. The Vice-Chair of the working group was aware of these donations, yet they were not disclosed to the group or declared as a conflict of interest. It has also been discovered that the Chair of the Working Group held investments in Shell, Total and BP. Vice-Chancellor Stephen Toope was not only aware of these donations and the compromised interests of working group members, but met with BP representatives for the donation just weeks after rejecting divestment. This information is a source of total outrage, particularly for the majority of students and staff at the university who have repeatedly spoken out in favour of divestment and immediate action to tackle climate change. The legitimacy of that decision against divestment has been completely undermined, as it is now clear that it was ultimately informed by the report of a working group with vested interests . These revelations serve to emphasise the dangerous extent to which Cambridge is wedded to companies which are fuelling climate breakdown. It is time for the University to demonstrate a serious commitment to transparent investment and climate justice. Cambridge is lagging behind pathetically on the issue of divestment, despite its supposed status as a world-leading institution. 50 UK universities have committed to full divestment and Ireland became the first country to divest last year. New York City has recently declared that it will be divesting $5 billion from fossil fuels, as well as suing the world’s most powerful fossil fuel companies. The University of Cambridge needs to follow suit before it is too late: it must act now to delegitimise these companies by casting off their grip on the university and its internal structures. It is imperative that the report of the Divestment Working Group is revoked and that a new consultation process on how the University should divest is initiated.
    1,433 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Zero Carbon Cambridge
  • Cambridge University, commit to a 2030 carbon neutral target
    Climate change is the most urgent ethical issue of our time. The United Nations recent IPCC report laid out the stark urgency of staying below 1.5 degrees warming to avoid catastrophic climate breakdown. If the world overshoots 1.5 degrees warming there will be enormous levels of human suffering due to changes in weather patterns, dwindling resources, and increased frequencies of natural disasters. These effects will be disproportionately felt by countries in the global south and the world's poorest populations. Each fraction of a degree is of crucial importance. 2 degrees of warming, as supposed to 1.5 degrees, would expose an additional 10 million people to impacts like coastal flooding and saltwater affecting agriculture and drinking water due to raised sea levels. It would thaw an additional estimated 1.5-2.5 million square kilometres of permafrost, releasing methane gas in a vicious cycle of warming. These effects will jeapordise the lives and livelihoods of those relying on fishing and farming, exposing an additional several hundred million people to poverty and climate related risks by 2050, and the IPCC is estimating that by 2050 the amount of displaced peoples will reach between 150-300 million. It would virtually wipe out coral reefs, see the rate of biodiversity loss double, and expand the range of insects carrying deadly diseases such as malaria and dengue. The report also confirmed the scientific consensus that urgent, unprecedented, systemic action must be taken to phase out fossil fuels. Cambridge University has a moral obligation to take every action possible to play their part in tackling climate change. Their current target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, and newly proposed target of 2040, both do not reflect the urgency of the situation. They are wholly inadequate in helping keep warming below 1.5 degrees. Recently, councils and other institutions have been taking the lead across England in declaring a climate emergency and committing to achieving carbon neutrality by 2030. The City of Bristol did this in November 2018, followed by the London Assembly in December 2018. The councils of Stroud, Scarborough, Forest of Dean, Oswestry, and more have done the same. Other Universities have taken action, with Universities such as Plymouth and KCL having committed to 2030 and 2025 carbon neutral targets respectively. Cambridge University too has a duty to act. This is an emergency. We call on Cambridge University to commit to concrete radical action on climate change now.
    513 of 600 Signatures
    Created by CUSU Ethical Affairs
  • King's College London Go Sweatshop Free - Join Electronics Watch
    Every year, billions of pounds are spent by public bodies in the UK and Ireland on ICT equipment including phones, laptops, computers and tablets. Workers that made them likely spent excessively long hours working in dangerous factories. Some are at risk of developing cancer from toxic chemical exposure, which also pollutes the environment. Many sweatshop workers experience violence and are at risk of modern slavery. Electronics Watch is an independent labour monitoring organisation for the electronic industry. Electronics Watch members are public bodies who are coming together to use their collective influence over the industry to improve working conditions in factories across the globe. When joining, institutions write human and labour rights guarantees into their contracts with suppliers. Electronics Watch conducts monitoring of factories on behalf of its members, reporting back about conditions and treatment of works. They then negotiate with global brands, manufacturing companies and factory owners to address any labour rights violations that have been found. Our money is being spent on these products and we're demanding that money be used to eradicate rather than perpetuate a system based on exploitation of workers and inhumane conditions!
    121 of 200 Signatures
    Created by Molly Robson
  • Newcastle University Go Fossil Free
    Climate break down is happening now. From deadly forest fires in California to South Pacific islands sinking as a result of sea-level rise, we are already feeling the effects of rising global temperatures. This poses a tremendous threat to humanity and all other life on this planet. Climate change is a social justice issue. It disproportionately affects people who bear little responsibility for its causes, including communities in the Global South who are on the frontline of fossil fuel extraction, and minority-ethnic and working class communities in the Global North. The latest United Nations IPCC report tells us we must cut global carbon emissions by at least 45% by 2030 if we are to stand any chance of limiting average global temperature rise to 1.5°C. If we don't do so, we will face significantly more extreme impacts in the form of droughts, floods, and poverty for hundreds of millions of people, within our lifetimes. We must act collectively to do everything in our power to cut carbon emissions as fast as possible. (1) https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/freedomofinformation/files/Investments-July-2017.pdf
    204 of 300 Signatures
    Created by Rebecca D'Andrea
  • Stop Union Busting in the Electronics Industry
    The ability for workers to form, join and organise within a trade union is a fundamental human right. It is also vital in order for workers to negotiate with management for better pay and conditions. Studies have shown that "union representation is generally very low and corporate resistance to unionisation is widespread" within the electronics industry. Companies involved in the manufacture of electronics have been found making deliberate attempts to stop the establishment of unions in their factories. Tactics they have used include preventing unions communicating with workers, subjecting union members to discrimination, dismissal, intimidation or violence, and establishing "paper" unions which do not represent the interests of workers but are built to create an illusion of unionisation. A 2016 report by the ITUC found that Samsung has engaged in union busting practices. The ITUC General Secretary Sharon Burrow argued "From the top of its supply chain down, Samsung prohibits the formation of unions". But the problem isn't unique to Samsung. Lack of union representation is endemic within the electronics industry. Stand in solidarity with electronics workers across the world, and support their right to union representation!
    1,423 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Chris Jarvis
  • Drop the Word 'Illegal' to Describe Migrants
    The term 'illegal' is the most common precursor to the word 'migrant' in the media. There are a myriad of reasons why that is both an inaccurate and a harmful word to be using. It is legally incorrect, misleading, ignores international legal obligations and violates the principle of due process. It also criminalises and dehumanises people, preventing fair discussion, threatening solidarity and costing lives. It shouldn't be the role of journalists to embrace the narratives of political parties that scapegoat migrants. As one of the oldest newspapers in the country, we believe that the Yorkshire Post can do better. Here are a few quotes from young refugees and asylum seekers speaking on how the label ‘illegal’ made them feel: “It makes me feel like I’m a dangerous weapon to society. If I carry a firearm, it’s illegal. It’s like you’re saying migrant is synonymous with firearm” - Prakesh, young migrant “You feel it in everyday life, I’m not considered a human being like everyone else, the media is the source to creating all of this in the public eye” - Zahra, young migrant “It makes you feel like you don’t belong in society” - Priya, young migrant
    1 of 100 Signatures
    Created by Chris Jarvis
  • Cambridge University, listen to your members and divest from fossil fuels
    The democratic will of the University could not be clearer. Regent House, the University’s governing body and “the embodiment of the University as a democratic institution”, passed a grace committing the University to full divestment. Time and time again, academics have voiced their concerns. Student support has been unequivocal - CUSU Council voted unanimously for divestment in November 2017, with the Graduate Union also voting to express its support. JCRs at Christ’s, Peterhouse, Newnham, King’s, Magdalene, Sidney Sussex, Emmanuel, Selwyn and Churchill have all passed motions in favour of divestment. We believe that a University should listen to its members, rather than disregard their opinions. As vice-chancellor Stephen Toope said himself, climate change is the most important ethical issue of our age. Since 2008, an average of 26.4 million people per year have been displaced from their homes by disasters brought on by natural hazards. This is the equivalent to one person being displaced every second. Yet fossil fuel companies show no signs of changing their destructive practices. Their current reserves of oil, coal, and gas contain five times as much carbon as can ever be safely burned if we are to avoid runaway climate catastrophe. With an endowment of £6.3 billion, of which an estimated £377 million is invested in fossil fuels, as well as internationally respected reputation, Cambridge University has a unique opportunity to send the message that we cannot keep funding climate change. Stephen Toope said that he wanted the University to be a “social leader” – divestment is the chance to fulfil that aspiration, and commit to a future that is sustainable, ethical, and committed to climate justice. More than 60 universities across the UK have already committed to divestment, with Bristol, Durham and Edinburgh doing so in the past few months alone. The City of New York and World Bank have also announced they will divest, and for good reason: one Oxford Smith School study said that divestment movements had achieved legislative success in “almost every” historical case. As these examples, as well as a Cambridge Zero Carbon Society report from January 2018, illustrate, there are many different ways in which the University could go about divesting. We urge Cambridge to respond to the will of its staff and students, and join the ranks of institutions across the world in divesting from fossil fuels.
    1,298 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Zero Carbon Cambridge